Choosing the Right Personality Assessment Tool for Your Team

Personality and behavioral assessments are widely used by organizations seeking to strengthen communication, leadership effectiveness, and collaboration. When chosen carefully and applied thoughtfully, they can provide a shared language for understanding differences, navigating conflict, and improving how teams work together.

At the same time, assessments are often misunderstood or misused. Selecting the wrong tool — or relying too heavily on any one result — can oversimplify complex human behavior. The real value of an assessment lies not in categorizing people, but in helping individuals and teams reflect, learn, and adapt.

This article explores how to choose the right personality or behavioral assessment for your team, what distinguishes high-quality tools, and how organizations can use assessment insights responsibly and effectively.

Why Personality and Behavioral Assessments Matter

Assessments can help teams surface dynamics that are otherwise difficult to name — differences in communication styles, responses to stress, or approaches to decision-making.

Research published by Harvard Business Review highlights that personality and behavioral tools are most effective when they help teams discuss differences openly and reduce unproductive conflict, rather than reinforce labels.

From an organizational perspective, Deloitte notes that assessments add the most value when embedded in broader learning, leadership development, and culture initiatives, not used in isolation.

When aligned with clear goals, assessments can support:

• More effective communication and collaboration

• Greater self-awareness among leaders

• Healthier approaches to conflict

• Stronger trust and accountability within teams

Start with the Purpose, Not the Tool

One of the most common mistakes organizations make is selecting an assessment based on popularity rather than purpose.

Before choosing a tool, it’s important to clarify:

• Are you focusing on individual development, team effectiveness, or both?

• Is the assessment intended for learning and growth, team alignment, or selection decisions?

• Will results be discussed in a facilitated setting or used independently?

In leadership and team development work at Loeb Leadership, assessments are most effective when they are clearly connected to a broader objective, such as improving communication, strengthening trust, or supporting leaders during transition.

What to Look for in a High-Quality Assessment

1. Workplace Relevance

Assessments should focus on how people show up at work, including how they communicate, make decisions, and collaborate, rather than abstract personality traits that are difficult to translate into action.

2. Credible Research Foundation

While no assessment is perfect, credible tools are supported by research and designed for organizational use. Guidance from SHRM emphasizes the importance of choosing tools that align with defined needs and intended outcomes.

3. Clarity and Accessibility

The most useful assessments are easy to understand and discuss. Clear language and practical frameworks help teams apply insights long after the initial assessment experience.

4. Thoughtful Interpretation

Assessments are most impactful when paired with skilled facilitation. Context, dialogue, and reflection matter just as much as the data itself.

Common Types of Assessments Used in Team Development

Organizations often rely on a small set of assessment approaches that consistently support leadership and team growth when used well.

Behavioral Style Assessments

Behavioral assessments focus on observable behavior — how individuals communicate, respond to challenges, and interact with others. Because they emphasize behavior rather than fixed personality traits, they encourage flexibility and growth rather than labeling.

Tools like these are often used to support team workshops, leadership coaching, and communication development, particularly when teams are navigating change or increased complexity. Examples of behavioral and leadership assessments commonly used in our leadership development work can be found here.

Team Effectiveness Assessments

Team-level assessments shift the focus from individuals to how the group functions as a whole. They explore factors such as trust, conflict, commitment, accountability, and results — helping teams identify patterns that may be limiting effectiveness.

Research summarized by the American Psychological Association underscores the importance of psychological safety — the shared belief that it’s safe to speak up — as a foundation for learning and performance in teams.

Team effectiveness assessments are particularly valuable for intact teams that want to improve collaboration, alignment, and shared responsibility.

Selection and Development Assessments

Some assessments are designed to support hiring or role alignment by examining behavioral tendencies, interests, and cognitive demands. When used responsibly and in combination with structured interviews and clear criteria, they can add rigor to talent decisions.

As with any assessment, ethical use and clear communication are essential, especially when results may influence employment decisions.

Using Assessment Results Responsibly

Even well-designed assessments can fall short if they’re applied without care. A few guiding principles help ensure assessments support growth rather than limitation:

• Avoid over-interpretation. An assessment offers insight, not a complete picture of a person.

• Create space for reflection. Results are most meaningful when individuals can explore them without judgment.

• Connect insights to action. The real value comes from what teams do differently — how they communicate, lead meetings, or address challenges together.

Organizations that integrate assessments into ongoing leadership and team development efforts tend to see more sustainable impact.

Choosing the right personality or behavioral assessment is less about finding the most popular tool and more about selecting one that aligns with your purpose, culture, and people. When assessments are grounded in research, introduced thoughtfully, and paired with meaningful conversation, they can become powerful catalysts for growth, helping teams communicate more effectively, lead more intentionally, and work together more successfully.

Organizations often find that the greatest value of assessments comes not from the tools themselves, but from how insights are interpreted and applied. Loeb Leadership works with leaders and teams to use assessments as a foundation for meaningful dialogue, stronger leadership practices, and healthier team dynamics. By integrating assessment insights into facilitated conversations, coaching, and development experiences, organizations can improve communication, strengthen trust, and translate greater self-awareness into sustained performance.

Choosing Personality Assessments for Teams

What is the best personality assessment for teams?
There is no single “best” assessment. The right tool depends on your goals — whether you’re focused on communication, leadership development, or team effectiveness.

Are personality assessments scientifically valid?
Some tools have stronger research foundations than others. It’s important to select assessments designed for workplace use and supported by validation studies.

Should assessments be used for hiring decisions?
Assessments can support hiring when used appropriately, but they should never be the sole basis for decisions. Structured interviews and role-specific criteria remain essential.

How often should teams revisit assessments?
Many organizations revisit assessments during leadership transitions, team changes, or every one to two years as part of ongoing development.

Follow Gordon Loeb on LinkedIn for more insights on leadership training, org design and development, and executive coaching.